Follow the Infrastructure: Site Selection Strategies Post-OBBB

Infrastructure investment has always been a directional signal for future growth, but the post-OBBB (Our Built Better Bill) environment raises the stakes in a way commercial real estate (CRE) investors can’t afford to overlook. With billions earmarked for road expansions, high-speed broadband, public transit, and utility upgrades across key suburban and secondary markets, it’s no longer enough to assess locations based on current accessibility or existing amenities. The focus now shifts to forecasting infrastructure-driven demand curves—and positioning early.

CRE strategy has entered a phase where asset value is increasingly tied to projected functionality rather than present-day footfall or tenancy. Site selection decisions post-OBBB are being driven by a new playbook—one where proximity to planned projects, shovel-readiness, and government-aligned zoning overlays are the leverage points that separate top-tier portfolios from stagnant ones.

Infrastructure Signals Are No Longer Speculative—They’re Institutional

Before OBBB, infrastructure promises were mostly seen as political theater—easy to announce, harder to implement. Today, funded projects are not only real but tracked and under public scrutiny. The Department of Transportation, Commerce, and Energy have released layered project maps that CRE firms are already parsing through using GIS tools, AI-enhanced demographic overlays, and predictive logistics modeling.

A single corridor expansion or transit line can reprice hundreds of acres of surrounding land in a 12–24 month horizon. Take the recent USDOT-funded beltline widening project in Central Florida—announced in late 2023, breaking ground in early 2025, and already impacting pre-development activity as far as 10 miles out. Industrial developers are bidding on sites that were formerly agricultural-zoned with long-term entitlements simply because access roads are now in motion.

Investors who rely on traditional comps or 12-month trailing rents are already mispricing these zones. The underwriting lens must shift from ‘what’s here today’ to ‘what the access map will look like post-capex deployment.’ The opportunity cost of waiting for completion is growing steeper.

Broadband Rollouts Are Rewriting Suburban Office Strategy

For the first time in two decades, broadband capacity is being viewed as equal to power, water, and waste. Site selectors in the suburban office space—particularly near second-tier tech corridors—are focusing heavily on fiber rollout timelines. OBBB’s $65 billion broadband expansion program is enabling tertiary markets to compete for enterprise-level back-office hubs, engineering satellites, and fintech operations.

Submarkets in North Carolina, Ohio, and Arizona that were previously outside of digital-first company maps are now securing site visits due to guaranteed multi-gigabit infrastructure. The impact extends beyond traditional office: flex space, R&D hubs, and logistics command centers now require symmetrical upload speeds and latency guarantees for embedded IoT operations and automation management.

A significant number of municipalities have already begun issuing digital utility readiness certificates as part of planning board submissions—a move that gives early applicants a first-mover advantage with tech-forward tenants.

Freight Efficiency Is Repricing Industrial Land Near DOT Projects

Not all roads are equal. What matters post-OBBB is whether a roadway investment reduces freight drag, improves last-mile reach, or connects intermodal nodes. Site selection strategy for industrial is being reframed by the National Freight Strategic Plan priorities, which now dictate where the next two decades of goods movement will be optimized.

Land located near upgraded arterial highways or new intermodal linkages—especially those tied to inland port projects—are already being repriced, regardless of whether vertical development has started. In Georgia, the I-16 and I-75 interchange improvements are not only triggering warehouse pre-leasing spikes, but also land-banking activity by major REITs who previously focused on Atlanta’s established zones.

CRE operators with logistics-focused portfolios are aligning with state departments of transportation to review five-year roadmaps and weigh the permitting risk against asset appreciation. This isn’t just a land play—it’s a cost-to-serve reduction opportunity that feeds directly into tenant profitability models.

Transit-Adjacent Retail Is in a New Category of Its Own

Transit-oriented development (TOD) isn’t new, but what’s changed post-OBBB is the level of federal funding tied to suburban and exurban transit connectors. Light rail, BRT (bus rapid transit), and micro-mobility infrastructure are receiving full-cycle investment that bypasses the funding gaps typical of past urban transit attempts.

Retail developers have taken note. There’s a wave of acquisition targeting TOD parcels not just for traditional shopping centers, but for mixed-use configurations that include medical retail, live-work studios, and hospitality-driven third places.

What makes these parcels particularly attractive is the predictability of foot traffic and the alignment with state-level sustainable transportation mandates. Developers in markets like Minneapolis-St. Paul and Charlotte are acquiring air rights and pushing entitlement envelopes now, well in advance of ridership gains. The real upside lies in controlling anchor locations that will be naturally backfilled by demand as the transit corridors are completed.

The Smart Money Is Following Utility Grid Modernization, Quietly

One of the least discussed but most consequential OBBB-related initiatives is utility grid modernization. CRE developers who specialize in mission-critical assets—data centers, cold storage, medical, or cannabis-adjacent uses—are tracking substation upgrades, battery storage deployments, and microgrid pilot zones.

Markets with aging transmission lines or limited power redundancy are increasingly seen as future-proofing risks. In response, site selectors are prioritizing parcels within a 5–10 mile radius of announced grid modernization plans. That means not only proximity to clean energy generation, but proximity to infrastructure that can actually support scalable load growth.

California and Texas are early examples. The ERCOT and CAISO modernization efforts are shifting investment interest from urban cores to rural edges where redundancy and speed-to-power-up are improving faster than zoning restrictions in urban zones.

This also opens the door to speculative zoning overlay requests and public-private infrastructure agreements that make sites viable earlier than their market comps would suggest.

How Site Selection Strategy Is Being Rebuilt Around Predictive Infrastructure Timing

The ability to forecast infrastructure deployment timelines is fast becoming a competitive edge. Traditional due diligence processes are being upgraded with predictive analytics tools that scrape permitting databases, track contractor bids, and monitor equipment deployment patterns to estimate when an infrastructure improvement will actually translate into usable access or capacity.

Firms that can model this timing with 85–90% accuracy are not just better at site selection—they're building margin into the timeline itself. They’re acquiring land, initiating entitlements, and bringing sites to market in sync with infrastructure rollouts, avoiding the typical 12–24 month gap where holding costs eat into return profiles.

This also changes the way investment committees are underwriting. The risk isn’t the infrastructure happening; it’s being too late to the re-rating. Timing now trumps raw location quality—especially in growth markets where several competing corridors may all look attractive on paper.

Rethinking Entitlements and Zoning in the Wake of Infrastructure Announcements

Infrastructure investment is beginning to reset the political will behind zoning boards and entitlement fast-tracks. Municipalities that previously took years to process mixed-use or multi-family zoning changes are being pressured by regional planning authorities to fast-track approvals in alignment with state infrastructure targets.

Site selection firms are working hand-in-hand with land use attorneys and former municipal planners to position their applications as infrastructure-supportive developments—an increasingly persuasive approach that aligns with transportation and utility investment narratives.

There’s also a noticeable uptick in jurisdictions that are pre-entitling land as part of OBBB-funded infrastructure corridors. Developers who stay passive until RFPs are issued are missing the opportunity to shape those pre-entitlement efforts in their favor.

Strategic Land Banking Isn’t a Backburner Strategy Anymore

Land banking has returned, not as a hedge but as a calculated infrastructure-aligned deployment tactic. National builders, REITs, and logistics-focused operators are acquiring sites two to five years ahead of full infrastructure activation, based on projected mobility improvements and broadband coverage.

They’re locking in parcels at discount pricing, running minimal holding cost strategies (agriculture leasing, solar farm installations), and preparing for full entitlement only once infrastructure progress reaches a specific completion milestone—often 60% or higher.

This isn't passive investment. It’s sequencing. With predictable infrastructure timelines, CRE developers are now programming land use strategies to optimize both asset readiness and valuation upticks.

Final Thought: Miss the Infrastructure, Miss the Runway

OBBB funding won’t last forever, but its impact will define the next two decades of CRE growth patterns. Those who treat infrastructure like a trailing indicator will find themselves perpetually paying premiums in zones that smarter capital entered years earlier. The strategy now isn’t just to follow infrastructure—but to forecast it with precision, build around it with intention, and align capital deployment with activation timelines.

CRE professionals ready to recalibrate their site selection models accordingly will find themselves well ahead of the next wave of cap rate compression and tenant competition. The rest will be stuck chasing sites that got priced out before the asphalt dried.

630-778-1800 | info@suburbanrealestate.com